| Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Dustination
2812 Dustination
| Subject: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Dec 27, 2015 1:04 pm | |
| Discuss whether or not you think Rosalina & Luma should be added to Super Smash Bros. Crusade.
|
|
| |
MarioStrikerMurphy1994 Level 5 CPU
345
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:24 am | |
| I support her. We need another Super Mario Princess in this game (altought I support more to Daisy...) |
|
| |
TrinitroMan Level 7 CPU
1244
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Tue Dec 29, 2015 4:45 am | |
| I normally would have said yes, but then I remembered how jank she is in Smash 4. Please, I don't want my nightmares to continue. |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:17 am | |
| Fun fact: the old dev team had her on the roster, but was cut by the new development team.
Then she was confirmed for Smash 4. What a twist! I blame Det. |
|
| |
Braystar Level 7 CPU
1231 N/A
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:50 am | |
| Yes plz. If Petey can be in, so can Rosa |
|
| |
Tetriser Level 2 CPU
21
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:21 am | |
| Support for Rosalina & Luma! |
|
| |
Athorment
434 Athorment
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:36 pm | |
| Support for Rosalina & Luma!
Specially since better balancing can be brought upon for her & Luma as well c: |
|
| |
TrinitroMan Level 7 CPU
1244
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:45 pm | |
| Rosalina herself is fine. It's the Luma that makes the character so annoying. At least decrease the base knockback of that thing and/or make it unable to attack while Rosalina is in shieldstun. |
|
| |
Sean_McMuffin Level 4 CPU
175 EnderSean311
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Jan 10, 2016 8:28 pm | |
| |
|
| |
UcheD914 Level 3 CPU
75 Nin_Fan914
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:02 pm | |
| Rosalina & Luma should be in. The tag action that they use can match that of the Ice Climbers, if not exceed them. |
|
| |
Bedoop! Level 4 CPU
137
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:28 pm | |
| Although not a support, just hopping in to bring in some speculation. Since Alternate Playstyles are a thing now, if Rosalina & Luma were to get in do you think they'd have Playstyles where you play as just Rosalina with buffed offense but no Luma and/or just Luma with the ability to not die but no Rosalina to help you out?
Seems like it'd be fun playing as just the Luma, but that's just my thoughts. |
|
| |
Alexander
620 KingTremolo
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:28 pm | |
| - Bedoop Bro wrote:
- Although not a support, just hopping in to bring in some speculation.
Since Alternate Playstyles are a thing now, if Rosalina & Luma were to get in do you think they'd have Playstyles where you play as just Rosalina with buffed offense but no Luma and/or just Luma with the ability to not die but no Rosalina to help you out?
Seems like it'd be fun playing as just the Luma, but that's just my thoughts. This would be the only way I'd support her inclusion. I like the character, don't like her gimmick. Plus just playing Luma sounds fun too. |
|
| |
Sean_McMuffin Level 4 CPU
175 EnderSean311
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Wed Mar 16, 2016 12:40 pm | |
| |
|
| |
JPIMW Level 3 CPU
70 Jpimw
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:22 am | |
| |
|
| |
MarioStrikerMurphy1994 Level 5 CPU
345
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Jun 04, 2017 8:17 pm | |
| Well, if she enters, I'd prefer she has her voice clips from Mercedes Rose (Super Mario Galaxy, mario Kart Wii), please. |
|
| |
alexmauricio407 Level 1 CPU
19
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:27 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Athorment
434 Athorment
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:25 pm | |
| - TrinitroMan wrote:
- Rosalina herself is fine.
It's the Luma that makes the character so annoying.
"Popo Himself is fine. It's Nana what makes the ice climbers so annoying". Learn your counterplay. - TrinitroMan wrote:
At least decrease the base knockback of that thing and/or make it unable to attack while Rosalina is in shieldstun. That's the magic of having a development team. They can avoid making Rosalina Exactly as Sm4sh and balance Luma better. I there's a Mario character that has the originality and relevance to make it in, it's rosa/luma Luma alone would be hilarious, probably as a joke alt at least. |
|
| |
Agent___5 Level 4 CPU
179
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:44 am | |
| - Athorment wrote:
Luma alone would be hilarious, probably as a joke alt at least. Don't forget to give Luma 1/4 of Rosalina weight |
|
| |
Alexander
620 KingTremolo
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:30 pm | |
| I would like to retract my previous statements about Rosaluma.
I'd absolutely love to see this character in Crusade now that I'm more familiar both playing them, and playing against them. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Rosalina & Luma [Super Mario Bros.] Discussion | |
| |
|
| |
|