| CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Smash King Smash King
8744 EJ88201
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:59 pm | |
| - Dr.MarioX wrote:
- GoldenYuiitusin wrote:
- IMO:
Mario (Dr.Mario as alt) Luigi Peach Bowser Bowser Jr. Toad Waluigi
^Fix'd Agree |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:17 pm | |
| - SmashKing201 wrote:
- Dr.MarioX wrote:
- GoldenYuiitusin wrote:
- IMO:
Mario (Dr.Mario as alt) Luigi Peach Bowser Bowser Jr. Toad Waluigi
^Fix'd Agree 10char Also, Paper Mario is like Classic Sonic is to Modern Sonic, considering shape. He also has black, circle eyes that make him seem like a cartoon character from the black and white days. Also, being flat, during some moves you'll see that his body is just flat. IMO he should get the DLC spot. |
|
| |
Smash King Smash King
8744 EJ88201
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:29 pm | |
| In my opinion, Paper Mario should be cut out the game entirely. Though Geno is not much of a good choice of a Mario character, as much as I really hate him, but at least he is unique in fighting style and appearance, plus he can represent the RPG. But this is just my opinion.
I think with the poll for the Mario series, we should have 3 choices. Geno, Rosalina, & Paper Mario. Winner gets DLC spot while the rest are cut entirely. I know this has already been discussed but thought I bring it up again. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:47 pm | |
| - Dr.MarioX wrote:
- GoldenYuiitusin wrote:
- IMO:
Mario (Dr.Mario as alt) Luigi Peach Bowser Bowser Jr. Toad Waluigi
^Fix'd Dammit, how'd I forget mah Melee main, Doc? |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:48 pm | |
| @SmashKing Paper Mario represents a RPG (2 of them, soon to be 3) as well, and has appeared in more games than Geno. Have you even played a Paper Mario game before? He'd play NOTHING like Mario. |
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:57 pm | |
| Alright, I'm going to say this.
Geno is not going to be under the MARIO REP section. I have planned him to have his own icon, just like Waluigi was originally. Geno doubles as a Square Rep, since we don't have a viable one as of now. Rosalina and Paper Mario SHOULD get the boot.
But Geno is way too freaking Popular, and I agree it is way more then it should be. But we can't make this roster completely biased. So Geno should stay. |
|
| |
Smash King Smash King
8744 EJ88201
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:04 pm | |
| - StayPuft wrote:
- @SmashKing
Paper Mario represents a RPG (2 of them, soon to be 3) as well, and has appeared in more games than Geno. Have you even played a Paper Mario game before? He'd play NOTHING like Mario. I agree, Paper Mario is a better representative than Geno when you compare which is better for the RPG series. Though the problem is that its still Mario, but in paper form. The appearance is the big issue in my opinion. Even though it is in paper form, everything about him appearance wise the the same as the original Mario. I actually use to own the Paper Mario game from the N64 console, its was iight nothing special. He has the hammer, can stomp, and use power-ups with the stars if I remember correctly. Sure he will have his own move set, but its the appearance that bothers me the most. He is just an alternate Mario. |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:33 pm | |
| If you get the chance, play Paper Mario 2. It's one of the best RPGs (heck, one of the best GAMES) I've ever played, and most likely why I'm so much for Paper Mario. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:38 pm | |
| Using the same logic, play SM:RPG. Is one of the best rpgs ever created.
Geno> Paper Mario. Because PM is a..... Mario amde of papper. |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:50 pm | |
| I would argue PM2 is better. BUT, that is opinion. |
|
| |
Super Smash Bros Crusade Administrator
4179
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:53 pm | |
| I think I'm going to start up polls for the Big Four soon. Mario section of roster: Mario (Dr.Mario as alt) Luigi Peach Bowser Bowser Jr. Toad Waluigi
DLC Poll: Geno, Rosalina, Paper Mario. Unfortunately Petey doesn't seem to have any mention whatsoever so I won't bother including him.
Pokemon section of the roster: Pokemon Trainer - Squirtle, Ivysaur, Charizard Pikachu [Alternate: Pichu] Jigglypuff Mewtwo Lucario Zoroark
DLC Poll: Deoxys, Meowth, Plusle/Minun
LoZ stuff and Kirby stuff coming soon. |
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:33 pm | |
| You do you always ignore me. GENO WOULD REPRESENT SQUARE ENIX. You don't NEED to make him DLC, because you don't even have a Square Rep. ALSO GENO DOESN'T EVEN HAVE TO BE A MARIO REP. It's not like everyone would go "why the hell is he not a Mario rep" people KNOW, he doesn't belong to Nintendo.
|
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:35 pm | |
| We're going to have a FF rep.
FF = Square Enix |
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:38 pm | |
| - StayPuft wrote:
- We're going to have a FF rep.
FF = Square Enix There's nothing being said in the Roster topic about such. Last I saw, a FF Rep was to be DLC. |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:46 pm | |
| |
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:58 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Super Smash Bros Crusade Administrator
4179
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:13 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Super Smash Bros Crusade Administrator
4179
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:15 pm | |
| OP updated again.
Also, this is where discussion about the polls will take place, as both poll threads are now locked. The polls themselves are open until the dawn of SSBC version 1.0.
EDIT: Who I voted for: -Shantae -Quote -Chibi Robo -Professor Layton -Kite -Prinny -Earthworm Jim -Klonoa -Tetrominoe -Wilfre -Chell |
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:59 am | |
| As it's so popular, I may as well show you what I have for the Tetrominoe, I made it ages ago and I will improve on it if it gets in. - Spoiler:
|
|
| |
Dry
4607
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:20 am | |
| Tetrominoes are awesome and can kick Goku's ass any day. I am so voting for them. EDIT: Turns out most people are |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:20 am | |
| Voted: - Spoiler:
Heavy Ryu Hayabusa Wesker Slime Quote Shulk Popeye Tom Nook Ray MK Master Chief Andy Professor Layton Medusa Rash Kyo Kusanagi Lara Croft Heihachi Tetromino Captain Rainbow Travis Touchdown
|
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:23 am | |
| I think enough have voted for Tetrominoe to warrant me improving it, so I'll get started. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:33 am | |
| DLC is a long road ahead; IMO it would be best to focus on your current projects. |
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:47 am | |
| I voted: - Spoiler:
The Heavy Shantae Shulk Popeye Sora Takamaru Frank West Spyro Professor Layton Medusa I.M. Meen Morrigan Jak & Daxter Sly Cooper Travis Touchdown Chell
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:54 am | |
| - Spoiler:
Heavy Shantae Ryu Hayabusa Slime Quote Shulk Popeye Ratchet and Clank NiGHTS Sora Starfy Lip Takamaru Ray MK Master Chief Chibi Robo Muddy Mole Professor Layton Firebrand Medusa Moai Arthur I.M. Meen Sukapon Prinny SOPHIA Lara Croft Nobunaga Nightmare Viewtiful Joe Bonk Frogger Tetrominoe Wilfre Captian Rainbow The Prince Chell Klonoa
|
|
| |
SP
3856 cellularSP
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:59 am | |
| I suppose Generic didn't get the memo that we're only supposed to vote for 20 characters. |
|
| |
Jak
1533
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:09 am | |
| Full bias ahead - Spoiler:
The Heavy (Team Fortress 2) Ryu Hayabusa (Ninja Gaiden) Quote (Cave Story) Popeye the Sailor Man (Popeye) Tom Nook (Animal Crossing) Master Chief (Halo) Professor Layton (Professor Layton) Kratos (God of War) Sir Arthur (Ghosts & Goblins) Sukapon (Joy Mech Fight) Earthworm Jim (Earthworm Jim) Lara Croft Viewtiful Joe (Viewtiful Joe) Klonoa (Klonoa) Tetrominoe (a.k.a. L-Block) (Tetris) Captain Rainbow (Captain Rainbow) Gordon Freeman (Half-Life) Duke Nukem (Duke Nukem)
Travis Touchdown Frogger
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:22 am | |
| - Spoiler:
Klonoa Nightmare Nobunaga Sophia Prinny I.M. Meen Medusa Master Chief Takamaru Lip Sora NiGHTS Shulk Quote Ryu Hayabusa Heavy Chell Wilfre Tetrominoe Frogger
dere i fixed it |
|
| |
Dr.MarioX Level 8 CPU
1703
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:43 am | |
| Might I suggest a name change here?
It doesn't really roll of your tongue- CrusaDLC. How about DLCrusade? It makes much more sense, actually meaning "Downloadable Crusade" which is what's happening. "Crusa- Downloadable Content" doesn't make much sense.
Just saying DLCrusade would be a better title in my opinion.
|
|
| |
Leo Level 7 CPU
1385
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:46 am | |
| It isn't a better title, the current one is better. Now gtfo, and leave with your sh**** suggestions. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: CrusaDLC Pre-Development Discussion | |
| |
|
| |
|