Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion BklTYr4

Project Crusade Community

HomePortalSearchRegisterLog in

Share
 

 Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2  Next
AuthorMessage
Dustination



  Mach Rider
  2808
  Dustination

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 1:08 pm

Discuss whether or not you think Zelda should be added to Super Smash Bros. Crusade.
Back to top Go down
https://projectcrusade.forumotion.com/
SP



  3856
  cellularSP

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 1:30 pm

first!!
Back to top Go down
OmegaSteve777
Level 8 CPU
OmegaSteve777

  Gooey
  1750

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 2:25 pm

If Zelda doesn't end up in Crusade then you done goofed
Back to top Go down
thebuddyadrian
Level 5 CPU
thebuddyadrian

  362
  thebuddyadrian

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 4:02 pm

What? She's not already in? She NEEDS to be in Crusade no matter what she is an essential LoZ rep.
Back to top Go down
Dustination



  Mach Rider
  2808
  Dustination

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 4:22 pm

I don't know man I think Tingle is more important
Back to top Go down
https://projectcrusade.forumotion.com/
MarioStrikerMurphy1994
Level 5 CPU
MarioStrikerMurphy1994

  337

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Dec 27, 2015 11:34 pm

We need more Zelda characters, and Zelda is one of the characters from this franchise I'm hoping for alongside Sheik and Skull Kid.

About design for her, I'd prefer her original look from Ocarina of Time. And, about moveset, there's no trouble XD
Back to top Go down
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 1:27 am

Dustination wrote:
I don't know man I think Tingle is more important
LOL no. Tingle can burn in hell.

So yeah, I want Zelda to be playable, and I want her to replace Tingle.
Back to top Go down
Lego Shaq

Lego Shaq

  Geno
  1379

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 9:17 am

TrinitroMan wrote:
Dustination wrote:
I don't know man I think Tingle is more important
LOL no. Tingle can burn in hell.

So yeah, I want Zelda to be playable, and I want her to replace Tingle.
You realize Tingle is the 2nd most important character of the series, if not the 1st?
Back to top Go down
OmegaSteve777
Level 8 CPU
OmegaSteve777

  Gooey
  1750

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 11:40 am

TO BE FAIR, Tingle is the most recurring character in the series besides the obvious ones and Impa. And he is the only character to have his own game besides the obvious.

Anyway less about Tingle more about Zelda.

Phantom Slash or no?
Back to top Go down
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 11:47 am

Phantom Slash should be given to Toon Zelda instead, because Toon Zelda is canonically capable of that.
TP Zelda should instead use for her Down Special something that actually is possible in TP (maybe even replace her other specials since those belong to OoT canonically).
Back to top Go down
Lego Shaq

Lego Shaq

  Geno
  1379

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 12:02 pm

TrinitroMan wrote:
Phantom Slash should be given to Toon Zelda instead, because Toon Zelda is canonically capable of that.
TP Zelda should instead use for her Down Special something that actually is possible in TP (maybe even replace her other specials since those belong to OoT canonically).
Why exactly does Crusade need to be canon with Zelda if Smash itself isn't?
Back to top Go down
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 12:35 pm

I'm not saying that all of Zelda's specials have to be replaced. I only said that they could be replaced.
Down Special, though, I'm sure we can come up with something from Twilight Princess instead that Zelda could possibly use.
If everything else fails, then we could still just reuse her Smash 4 Down Special, but I rather want that to be Plan B.
Back to top Go down
Lego Shaq

Lego Shaq

  Geno
  1379

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 12:42 pm

TrinitroMan wrote:
I'm not saying that all of Zelda's specials have to be replaced. I only said that they could be replaced.
Down Special, though, I'm sure we can come up with something from Twilight Princess instead that Zelda could possibly use.
If everything else fails, then we could still just reuse her Smash 4 Down Special, but I rather want that to be Plan B.
Twilight Princess Zelda's design is one of her most iconic. Of course the DESIGN would be used.

It's pretty obvious Zelda's MOVESET is supposed to represent Zelda as a CHARACTER, and NOT Twilight Princess.
Back to top Go down
OmegaSteve777
Level 8 CPU
OmegaSteve777

  Gooey
  1750

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Dec 28, 2015 1:03 pm

And then they use the Skyward Sword design

send help
Back to top Go down
Tetriser
Level 2 CPU
Tetriser

  21

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Jan 03, 2016 7:24 am

Support for Zelda.

Add Sheik as her alternate form or as a separate character if possible.

Also, please make Zelda's Down Special as Phantom Slash, not changing her form.
Back to top Go down
https://sonargamesmy.wordpress.com
Doq
Level 6 CPU
Doq

  804
  Ask in 20 years.

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySun Jan 03, 2016 6:24 pm

I still think Transform should still be a thing.

Because separating Zelda and Sheik is a [esports] move by anybody ever.
Back to top Go down
http://www.doqk.ml/
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 4:06 am

No, remove the transform. TP Zelda could never transform in Shiek in the original Twilight Princess anyway.
Back to top Go down
Doq
Level 6 CPU
Doq

  804
  Ask in 20 years.

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 6:22 am

Solution: Have OOT Zelda instead.

Because Transform really absolutely positively needs to still be a thing.
Back to top Go down
http://www.doqk.ml/
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 8:11 am

No, no it doesn't.
Back to top Go down
Lego Shaq

Lego Shaq

  Geno
  1379

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 9:15 am

This is so exhausting

Sakurai himself doesn't care about how TP Zelda uses "noncanon moves", why should we.
Back to top Go down
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 10:50 am

Well, some of you guys do care about canonity too much. *points at Mellon*
For once, canonity would bring something good, because Transform is a waste of a Down B in my opinion.
Back to top Go down
Lego Shaq

Lego Shaq

  Geno
  1379

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyMon Jan 04, 2016 12:33 pm

TrinitroMan wrote:
Well, some of you guys do care about canonity too much. *points at Mellon*
For once, canonity would bring something good, because Transform is a waste of a Down B in my opinion.

*points at you because you have been bringing the most pointless canon arguments into this thread and im sure many more*
And if we do make it not Transform, make it Phantom Slash which is standalone Zelda's SSB4 Down Special.
Back to top Go down
lordvaati
Level 2 CPU
lordvaati

  32

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyTue Jan 05, 2016 5:56 pm

Obvious support, but PLEASE find a way to break her losing streak ova always being a below average character like she is in all the other Smash games.
Back to top Go down
Athorment

Athorment

  Ganondorf
  421
  Athorment

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyFri Jan 08, 2016 10:43 pm

I feel Zelda would be a fun character to have in Crusade. If you guys keep her the same way she is in Sm4sh it would be greatly appreciated if the Up B is not a killing move. Too many people relying on Up B spam on For Fun *shivers*. The Project M take of it having little hitstun but allowing Zelda to act out of it if she lands with it for combo follow ups would be a better approach imo.
Phantom Slash also should be stored like Samus' Charge Shot *nod*

If you guys want a different Zelda like the Ganondorf you have, you could add some Hyrule warriors flashiness with Light Arrows and sword stabs, but that might be better for a "Different incarnation of Zelda" to be playable beside the normal sm4sh one and that's tons of work in another area. Like having an OoT!Ganondorf that uses magic and a TP!Ganondorf that uses the sword, that might be just too much work to even consider.

_________________
lego shaq wrote:
look without "BUT X CHARACTER NEEDS TO BE IN FIRST" goggles.

Athorment wrote:
Those "More deserving ones" will get votes regardless of circumstances, so i suggest supporting who you want in regardless of popularity

Crusade Wishlist::
 

Returning Veteran Wishlist::
 
Back to top Go down
http://athorment.deviantart.com/
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptyFri Jan 08, 2016 11:41 pm

B-b-but Up B being a killing move is that one thing that stops Zelda from being complete shit in terms of competitiveness.
Back to top Go down
AEM

AEM

  1763
  Ariand54321

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySat Jan 09, 2016 12:12 am

Too much of a side character IMO. Why would we want to add a deliberate low tier anyways?
Back to top Go down
TrinitroMan
Level 7 CPU
TrinitroMan

  1244

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySat Jan 09, 2016 12:44 am

*gasp*
S-s-side character?
She's the one to give this franchise her name in the first place!
She's Link's main goal in 2/3 of all the Zelda games.
She's incredibily integral to the story, being the wielder of a Triforce and having multiple reincarnations, just like Link.
Back to top Go down
AEM

AEM

  1763
  Ariand54321

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySat Jan 09, 2016 1:11 am

She's not playable, she's not a major antagonist, obv side character bois. She doesn't really do much either tbh, I mean considering the iteration of Zelda we'd add.

Besides my second point still stands.
Back to top Go down
TaXMaN
Level 6 CPU
TaXMaN

  PAC-MAN
  689

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySat Jan 09, 2016 3:07 am

TrinitroMan wrote:
*gasp*
S-s-side character?
She's the one to give this franchise her name in the first place!
She's Link's main goal in 2/3 of all the Zelda games.
She's incredibily integral to the story, being the wielder of a Triforce and having multiple reincarnations, just like Link.

Obviously Tingle is more important. Kappa
Back to top Go down
Braystar
Level 7 CPU
Braystar

  Waluigi
  1231
  N/A

Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion EmptySat Jan 09, 2016 3:44 am

Just keep her Smash 4 moveset. Maybe give her the Hyrule Warriors look, or keep Twilight Princess. IDK. But you can't have Link and Ganon without Zelda. The series is named after her ffs. And who cares about teirs? #TeirsR4Queers
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion   Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Zelda [The Legend of Zelda] Discussion
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 2Go to page : 1, 2  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Discussion: Metalphosis Archetype (TDIL)
» MARVEL LEGENDS ARES WAVE IN AUSTRALIA
» Marvel Legends you would like to see
» Brutal Legend
» Just got my first Brutal Legend

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Project Crusade Community ::  :: Character Discussion :: Unofficial Characters :: Smash Veterans-
Jump to:  
How to make a forum | © phpBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Forumotion.com