HomePortalCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Project Four : Smashing Predictions

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2
AuthorMessage
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:32 am

Updated with Toon Link's new uncloned moveset.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Masaomi
Level 6 CPU
avatar

  Toad
  585

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:46 am

I think Pokemon and Mario should have the same number of characters (most likely 5 and 5) since they are the Big 2 series. Having Zelda with 5 and Pokemon with 4 is kinda buggy to me.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:54 am

I forgot to put Meowth on the roster, but yeah, he is the fifth Pokemon rep
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:08 am

Why Meowth?
Back to top Go down
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:16 am

Mrs. Master wrote:
Why Meowth?
Because he is a popular Pokemon, he is a rival to Pikachu, and because he has been in every Pokemon Anime episode. The reason I even use the anime as a basis is because that is why Pikachu got in, because he was popular due to the anime.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
GigaPichu

avatar

  Weegee
  3392

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 1:03 pm

I'm fairly certain that Pikachu got in because he's the frickin MASCOT for Pokemon.
Though the anime obviously had a little influence on Smash, since the Pokemon say their names, which originated there.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 1:05 pm

GigaPichu wrote:
I'm fairly certain that Pikachu got in because he's the frickin MASCOT for Pokemon.
Though the anime obviously had a little influence on Smash, since the Pokemon say their names, which originated there.
Pikachi wasn't the mascot of Pokemon. At the beginning of Pokemon, for the most part the mascots were Charizard, Blastoise, and Venasaur. Pikachu became the mascot after the frickin ANIME.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:02 pm

No, I'm pretty sure Pikachu was in the anime because he was the mascot.
Especially since the mascot was originally going to be Clefairy and Ash was going to get a Clefairy to start with until Japan took a poll where Pikachu came out on top and Jigglypuff came in 2nd.
Guess which two Pokemon got in Smash? If anime was the biggest factor, we would've had Meowth instead of Jigglypuff, especially when you compare their roles.
Also, Meowth over Mewtwo and/or Lucario is a major error.
Back to top Go down
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:53 pm

Silver Lightan wrote:
Meowth over Mewtwo and/or Lucario is a major error.
Well, my philosophy is that if a character is removed, it is for a reason, and they won't come back. Hence why I didn't re-add Mewtwo or Young Link
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:22 pm

Your philosophy is foolish, especially when Mewtwo was removed due to time restraints.

Also, Bowser, Mewtwo (again), and Dedede were meant to be in 64, but also cut due to time restraints. They eventually came into the sequels.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:30 pm

Time restraint's apparently a big issue throughout the series. Hopefully the advent of DLC means that cut characters make a return.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:39 pm

Mrs. Master wrote:
Time restraint's apparently a big issue throughout the series. Hopefully the advent of DLC means that cut characters make a return.
IF there's DLC, characters cut for time are likely to return on later dates. So it would make that reasoning null and void. Very Happy
Back to top Go down
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:58 pm

Silver Lightan wrote:
Your philosophy is foolish, especially when Mewtwo was removed due to time restraints.

Also, Bowser, Mewtwo (again), and Dedede were meant to be in 64, but also cut due to time restraints. They eventually came into the sequels.
They never said anything about Mewtwo being removed for Time Restraints. However you are right when it comes to them not being in 64 because of them.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:12 pm

While it was not outright said that Mewtwo and Roy were cut due to time restraints, it's heavily implied with what information we were given.

1. Sakurai had mentioned that there were more characters he wanted to include, but had to scrap them to finish the game in time. Unlike 64, where he revealed Bowser, Mewtwo, and Dedede, he refused to state who.

2. Mewtwo and Roy have their own fanfare data (everyone has their own fanfare data, but only Meta Knight actually uses his instead of the "main" character's, in this case, Kirby. Wolf is the sole exception to this, as he does not have his own fanfare data.). No other scrapped character (Dr. Mario, Dixie Kong, Toon Zelda/Sheik, Plusle & Minun) has one.

Ergo, you add the two points together, and it's obvious that Mewtwo and Roy were characters Sakurai had to scrap for time.

HOWEVER, Mewtwo has a bigger shot at returning than Roy, given that Mewtwo had been planned for 64, was not a clone, and has been somewhat heavily promoted in recent times.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:12 am

Mewtwo>Meowth
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:22 am

And even then, there's the fact you cut Lucario as well.
If it's because of the "Mewtwo was replaced by Lucario so Lucario will be replaced by Zoroark" bullcrap, Ima rage, since Mewtwo was NOT replaced by Lucario.
Back to top Go down
Blitz [BANNED]
Level 7 CPU


  1079

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:45 pm

Updated with Zoroark's moveset. You mad Purple?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
AEM

avatar

  Geno
  1760
  Ariand54321

PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:35 am

That moveset is really bleh.
It doesn't seem much like a moveset for a Dark type Pokemon.

I mean, sure for a regal-like pokemon like Mewtwo and Lucario. It would fit fine.

But since Zoroark is a dark-type, and more oriented to be like a hunched savage predator. The moveset you have envisioned doesn't fit with the Pokemon species you made it for.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:35 am

This is late, but Mecha Bowser as Jr.'s Final Smash would be more unique.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Project Four : Smashing Predictions   

Back to top Go down
 
Project Four : Smashing Predictions
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 2Go to page : Previous  1, 2
 Similar topics
-
» AA GALS PREDICTIONS FOR THIS WEEKEND?
» Playoff predictions
» Team Project Revolution Official Thread!
» 2011-2012 Boys predictions A,AA,AAA
» Project Reality Mod BF2

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 ::  :: The Arcade-
Jump to:  
Forum create on Forumotion | © phpBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Free forum