| Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:52 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:21 am | |
| Two. It's a very minor series. |
|
| |
Smash King Smash King
8744 EJ88201
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:51 am | |
| @Generic: I respectfully disagree with your statement on how minor the series is. If that was the case then Mother shouldnt even be featured in a Smash game let alone have more than 1 stage & rep. Star Fox 64 is such a classic game that it had a remake on 3DS. Its an established series and is usually one of many series mentioned when fans discuss Nintendo. For a minor series, its sure get plenty of attention inside and outside Smash & gaming in general. By the way, Here is the current update on Numbered Stage Poll for Star Fox series. 1 votes for 2 stages 2 votes for 4 stages 1 votes for 5 stages if anyone wants to see my reasoning for my choice, feel free to look at the bottom of the previous page |
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:06 am | |
| 4 Stages.
A Classic Stage for Fox, a 64 Stage for Falco, an Adventures Stage for Krystal, and an Assault Stage for Wolf. |
|
| |
Youjustgotpuffed Level 1 CPU
19
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:28 am | |
| |
|
| |
Masaomi Level 6 CPU
585
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:39 am | |
| |
|
| |
Roy Level 7 CPU
1169 RoyMaster4
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:39 am | |
| We have 4 characters... if we continue the trend, it should have 4 stages. Might as well. |
|
| |
M. Bison Level 5 CPU
449
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:08 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:20 am | |
| Four is going to win regardless, so voting |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:44 am | |
| Four stages is my vote. I have a few ideas, but I'll save them for stage discussion. EDIT: Forgot to mention just for the sake of mentioning it... Starfox is among my favorite series, the only one I'm not too familiar with is Adventures. Still psyched for SF stages |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:11 am | |
| - SmashKing201 wrote:
- @Generic: I respectfully disagree with your statement on how minor the series is. If that was the case then Mother shouldnt even be featured in a Smash game let alone have more than 1 stage & rep. Star Fox 64 is such a classic game that it had a remake on 3DS. Its an established series and is usually one of many series mentioned when fans discuss Nintendo. For a minor series, its sure get plenty of attention inside and outside Smash & gaming in general.
Starfox only has six games. One of which was a remake, one of which was critcized because it was not in the style of the main Starfox games, and one that was criticized (although criticized less) for being out of the Arwings for most of the game. There are not enough significant areas in Starfox that can be easily unique, doable, and fun. Also, notice how in Brawl Starfox had three characters and two stages, one of which was veteran. Sakurai did a good job of balancing SF and Mother. Mother was rather popular in Japan, just not America. It has only had three stages in any smash game, rather than SF's four. |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:03 am | |
| We're going to have a million stages anyway. Compared to the Big Four, who are each getting 5-6 stages, SF and Mother could both easily get four stages, especially if Mother is as popular as you claim it is (which I don't doubt). SF doesn't deserve any more than four stages, but it certainly deserves more than three. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:56 am | |
| I vote three. I don't get why people keep saying "We need a stage for each character", when people didn't think Tingle deserved a stage, and he has his own frigging spin-offs. Hypocritical much? |
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:01 am | |
| - It wrote:
- I vote three.
I don't get why people keep saying "We need a stage for each character", when people didn't think Tingle deserved a stage, and he has his own frigging spin-offs. Hypocritical much? I'm a fairly strong believer in each character having their own stage. Mainly for if we decide to have an All-Star mode, after all, am I the only one who thought ROB looked very out of place on Mario Bros when he came up in SSBB. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:03 am | |
| Seeing as Tingle doesn't have a stage to call "his", that idea had been tossed out the window a long time ago.
|
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:22 am | |
| - It wrote:
- Seeing as Tingle doesn't have a stage to call "his", that idea had been tossed out the window a long time ago.
That's ridiculous then, Tingle has plenty of good ideas for stages! |
|
| |
Jak
1533
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:22 am | |
| |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:33 am | |
| - ʇɐǝɹƃǝɥʇuouɐפ wrote:
That's ridiculous then, Tingle has plenty of good ideas for stages! As we already discussed, no he doesn't. And @ It... we're not trying to rep individual characters, just as you said. But we are reping games, and the four console games should each get one (especially adventures and assault because they've never been reped before), so four stages is perfect. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:08 am | |
| Sure, rep the games that essentially DIVIDED the fanbase.
And what do you mean, "no he doesn't"? He does! It's just that no one gives a crap about it enough to see. |
|
| |
Smash King Smash King
8744 EJ88201
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:50 am | |
| Here is the current update on Numbered Stage Poll for Star Fox series.
1 votes for 2 stages
2 votes for 3 stages
9 votes for 4 stages
1 votes for 5 stages
Total of 13 People have voted
|
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:05 pm | |
| 3 Stages is the way to go, I think anyways. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:43 pm | |
| Two isn't going to make it. Three, then. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:02 pm | |
| 3 Stages. - Spoiler:
Great. Fountain of Dreams is in, and the OP lists it as "Fountain of Dreams (Melee)" Just what we need-Another battlefield clone.
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:26 pm | |
| Changing my 4 vote to 3. I'm so indecisive. |
|
| |
Youjustgotpuffed Level 1 CPU
19
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:27 pm | |
| Um about the if it's not a big sereis then why should mother be in it. I thought it had to popualr? The Mother sereis is very popualr i mean we used the one cartidge for Mother 1 to make a english rom, we loved earthbound, we made a Mother 3 fan translation and Mother 4 is being made by fans. And alose Geno is only in 2 games and there's not that many mainstream Rayman game. Can somebody please explain the requirments for somebody to be a character other then they have to be makeble? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:32 pm | |
| - Youjustgotpuffed wrote:
- The Mother sereis is very popualr i mean we used the one cartidge for Mother 1 to make a english rom, we loved earthbound, we made a Mother 3 fan translation and Mother 4 is being made by fans. And alose Geno is only in 2 games and there's not that many mainstream Rayman game. Can somebody please explain the requirments for somebody to be a character other then they have to be makeble?
The fans that made Earthbound fan translations make up a minority. Mother 4 is a fangame. Geno is a very popular suggestion for SSB (sadly). There ARE quite a few mainstream Rayman games. |
|
| |
Yeti Level 6 CPU
647
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:50 pm | |
| I Vote 5 1 for Starfox 1 SNES 1 for Starfox 2 (Unrealsed) SNES 1 for Starfox 64 1 for Starfox Adventures and 1 for Assult
if 4 wins 1 for Starfox 1+2 SNES 1 For 64 1 for Adventures 1 for Assult
If 3 wins 1 for SNES 1 for 64 1 for Assult(Can rep Both Krystal and Wolf)
If 2 Wins 1.Astroid Feild 2. ( you figure it out!)
There are my opinions But really if the Votes go to anything make it 4 not 3.
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:08 pm | |
| - Yeti Dk wrote:
- I Vote 5
1 for Starfox 1 SNES 1 for Starfox 2 (Unrealsed) SNES 1 for Starfox 64 1 for Starfox Adventures and 1 for Assult
Please do explain how we can make a stage off of an unreleased game made completely of loose polygons |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:16 pm | |
| - It wrote:
- Sure, rep the games that essentially DIVIDED the fanbase.
And what do you mean, "no he doesn't"? He does! It's just that no one gives a crap about it enough to see. Maybe they did devide the fanbase, but they should be reped anyway. By your logic we have to rep them because if we didn't rep all four games that would be "unfair," so that must mean you actually agree with me and everyone else who feel there should be four stages, one for each. About Tingle, if you actually took the time to read the debate over the Zelda stages you would know exactly why Tingle didn't get a stage, and one of several reasons was that there wasn't a single good stage design suggested. In fact the choice for voters regarding Tingle was simply titled "Tingle's Rupee Land," making no reference to a specific venue from the game. SK even said that we were all essentially "voting to have a stage from the game included," and that if it got in we would then "decide on a venue afterward." There were plenty of people who cared about Tingle, but they changed their mind (rightfully so) when people like PH4 and myself broke down how rediculous the idea of a Tingle stage was. That's what I meant by "no he doesn't." |
|
| |
Perfect Hell
8837
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:21 pm | |
| Yeti, the insults and profanity in that post were unnecessary.
Voting 4 stages, it deserves to be repped as much as Metroid
Also, why are we bringing back a Tingle debate, and why is someone else complaining about character roster? Contending discussed and finalized material voted by the majority is a pointless waste of time |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Crusade Stage Roster Discussion (Part 2) | |
| |
|
| |
|