TaXMaN Level 6 CPU
689
| Subject: Re: Character Removal for a Practical Roster? Wed May 11, 2016 8:20 am | |
| - wheeled_tank wrote:
- Braystar wrote:
- Tank, you do know the impact Crash had on gaming, right? He would be practical.
That is why he is "On The Ropes" and not "Remove". He IS iconic to video game history and HAS ties to Nintendo, but considering the behavior he started with (and, to be honest, still has) is the reasoning. I would keep him in (for practicality), if only barely. I see your point but let's not forget the "old SEGA vs Nintendo" days. SEGA wasn't really friendly back then with their commercials but look where Sonic ended up later on. |
|
Nintensis Level 4 CPU
160 jmf72115
| Subject: Re: Character Removal for a Practical Roster? Wed May 11, 2016 11:47 am | |
| Yup now Nintendo has Sega on a leash. |
|
wheeled_tank Level 6 CPU
603 wheeled_tank
| Subject: Re: Character Removal for a Practical Roster? Wed May 11, 2016 12:09 pm | |
| Naughty Dogs isn't. If it wasn't for SEGA being under Nintendo's Control, I would say the same about ALL of the Sonic characters. |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Character Removal for a Practical Roster? | |
| |
|