|
|
Author | Message |
---|
OmegaSteve777 Level 8 CPU
1750
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:18 pm | |
| I thought about it and the Final Smash reminded me of Mallow's Snowy...Same name, same function...
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM |
|
| |
Dustination
2812 Dustination
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:23 pm | |
| A giant snowman seems less interesting than a giant glacier tbh |
|
| |
Bedoop! Level 4 CPU
137
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:23 pm | |
| Well, I'll definitely be trying to pick up Popo when he launches with 0.9.1! Finally being able to play as a Solo Ice Climber is great~ Plus the Condor Up Special is my dream come true! Although I do find it odd that Nana is lighter than Popo, but Popo seems to have nothing to make him stick out. Maybe we could have Nana be lighter and slightly faster while Popo is heavier, a bit slower but hits harder by a little bit? Just some thoughts. |
|
| |
King Proto Level 5 CPU
427 ProtoBlur
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:12 pm | |
| That's a good idea, because then no one would use Nana because shes lighter, unless they wanted to anyway. |
|
| |
Nohrian Sadist
560 cheezetime
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:32 pm | |
| - SS_Maeweather wrote:
- That's a good idea, because then no one would use Nana because shes lighter, unless they wanted to anyway.
Lighter isn't exclusively bad or good. |
|
| |
OmegaSteve777 Level 8 CPU
1750
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:13 pm | |
| Is there a benefit for being lighter? I thought it just made it so you could die faster than someone heavier than you... |
|
| |
Nohrian Sadist
560 cheezetime
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:20 pm | |
| - OmegaSteve777 wrote:
- Is there a benefit for being lighter? I thought it just made it so you could die faster than someone heavier than you...
If you're lighter you're harder to effectively combo. |
|
| |
OmegaSteve777 Level 8 CPU
1750
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:21 pm | |
| thank you for informing me |
|
| |
Bedoop! Level 4 CPU
137
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:27 am | |
| Being Lighter also means floatier jumps, so Nana has technically the better recovery. |
|
| |
King Proto Level 5 CPU
427 ProtoBlur
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:53 am | |
| - Yosuke Hanamura wrote:
- OmegaSteve777 wrote:
- Is there a benefit for being lighter? I thought it just made it so you could die faster than someone heavier than you...
If you're lighter you're harder to effectively combo. I feel really stupid for not remembering such basic smash logic .-. |
|
| |
Perfect Hell
8837
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:27 am | |
| - Bedoop Bro wrote:
- Being Lighter also means floatier jumps, so Nana has technically the better recovery.
Light weight and floatiness are exclusive things. Weight has absolutely no effect on jumps. |
|
| |
King Proto Level 5 CPU
427 ProtoBlur
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:22 pm | |
| So is weight the only thing you changed? |
|
| |
Perfect Hell
8837
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:12 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Bedoop! Level 4 CPU
137
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Tue Mar 15, 2016 6:02 pm | |
| So Nana's the objectively better Popo since she's harder to combo.
...Huh. |
|
| |
AmareTSM
115 N/A
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Tue Mar 15, 2016 6:19 pm | |
| - Bedoop Bro wrote:
- So Nana's the objectively better Popo since she's harder to combo.
...Huh. But she dies earlier... we established this lol. |
|
| |
Bedoop! Level 4 CPU
137
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Tue Mar 15, 2016 6:23 pm | |
| - AmareTSM wrote:
- Bedoop Bro wrote:
- So Nana's the objectively better Popo since she's harder to combo.
...Huh. But she dies earlier... we established this lol. Oh. I didn't recall reading that in the past few pages + the announcement. Well. I'm a dunce. Ho-Hum. Pardon whilst I fly away majestically on the Condor of Hype. Sorry ; ^; |
|
| |
procrastinatingDestiny Level 6 CPU
875 DestinyIntwined
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Wed Mar 16, 2016 8:09 am | |
| - Bedoop Bro wrote:
- AmareTSM wrote:
- Bedoop Bro wrote:
- So Nana's the objectively better Popo since she's harder to combo.
...Huh. But she dies earlier... we established this lol. Oh. I didn't recall reading that in the past few pages + the announcement. Well. I'm a dunce. Ho-Hum. Pardon whilst I fly away majestically on the Condor of Hype.
Sorry ; ^; Goodbye, you majestic thing Anyway, how would one change the name, would you edit it yourself, or would it be the form? |
|
| |
Perfect Hell
8837
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Wed Mar 16, 2016 12:23 pm | |
| The name changes when you switch forms., like Evil Ryu or any SF alternate final smashes. |
|
| |
King Proto Level 5 CPU
427 ProtoBlur
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:27 am | |
| |
|
| |
buttonmasher525 Level 1 CPU
1 N/A
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion Thu Feb 06, 2020 5:30 pm | |
| Honestly I'm a little disappointed that the last post about Icies was in 2017. Was hoping people already labbed them to death and found like 6 ways to wobble lol. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Ice Climbers Discussion | |
| |
|
| |
|