| Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre | |
|
|
Which game do you feel is the best in this genre? | Call of Duty | | 15% | [ 3 ] | Halo | | 25% | [ 5 ] | Battlefield | | 15% | [ 3 ] | I don't care | | 45% | [ 9 ] |
| Total Votes : 20 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:29 pm | |
| Ok, so here it is; a thread to discuss total supremacy between Halo, Call of Duty and Battlefield. It doesn't matter what game you feel is better, I just want to get a general idea of who plays what game. Please try to stay on topic, have fun with your responses and please don't kill each other, ok? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:47 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Super Smash Bros Crusade Administrator
4179
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:19 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:21 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:44 pm | |
| - Fukube Satoshi wrote:
- ace of spades is better
i bet you like minecraft too |
|
| |
AEM
1763 Ariand54321
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:40 am | |
| tf2 wins
none of those games have hats and a great fanbase that would pay 5000 dara for a virtual hat with fire on it
none of them |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:44 am | |
| it always puzzles me how there are a population of people who are willing to spend real world money on a virtual hat that does nothing |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:36 am | |
| I never played Battlefield before, but I've seen enough gameplay to know what it's about. My vote goes to Halo, the reasons for which I already detailed in the previous thread. |
|
| |
C_Mill24 Level 9 CPU
2072 C-Mill24
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:06 am | |
| Why does this thread exist? |
|
| |
MercuryHg34
3883
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:10 am | |
| - GAMEfreak329 wrote:
- I just want to get a general idea of who plays what game.
That's why. |
|
| |
Perfect Hell
8837
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:55 am | |
| - Smashing Bowsaj wrote:
- Timespitters is king.
|
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:06 am | |
| - reynold wrote:
- it always puzzles me how there are a population of people who are willing to spend real world money on a virtual hat that does nothing
I don't understand buying them with real money, but I'm a trader and I find it very fun to collect this stuff. I have 3 Unusuals and two #1 Crafts, along with a load of other cool stuff and I didn't pay through the nose for any of it, I get through a Key a week maximum. |
|
| |
Dry
4607
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:47 am | |
| It's not much different to buying a silver necklace for your girlfriend. In a non-monetised world that necklace means nothing; it's just something that looks nice. But the amount anyone would pay for it is very high, which is why it's expensive. Same goes for those virtual hats; they don't really mean anything, but they have value in their very definition.
That said I'd never spend a quid on online crap. |
|
| |
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:22 pm | |
| For me it's a draw between Halo and Battlefield, because I have both; Battlefield doesn't rely on peer to peer like Halo 4, but Halo 4 has a great variety of modes to keep anyone occupied.
My personal favorite mode on each: BF: Scavenger, Halo 4: Grifball. Scavenger is fun, because you only start off with a pistol and knife; you have to pick up arms randomly spawned on the map. Grifball is fun because you can release your stress by smashing the enemy with the gravity hammer, or go a bit strategic with the sword.
Either game is good to me because as long as there are people who understand teamwork and the way each game is designed; both games are fun in their own ways and this is why I can't pick one over the other |
|
| |
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:25 pm | |
| - Crappy Cape wrote:
- Timespitters is king.
True, but Perfect Dark has a ton of customization options as well. I like the game a lot, especially when I have 3 of my friends playing split screen with me. It is sheer and utter chaos. Plus i have never played Timesplitters, sorry |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:44 pm | |
| - GAMEfreak329 wrote:
- Crappy Cape wrote:
- Timespitters is king.
True, but Perfect Dark has a ton of customization options as well. I like the game a lot, especially when I have 3 of my friends playing split screen with me. It is sheer and utter chaos. Plus i have never played Timesplitters, sorry You should try it. Many of the guys who made Goldeneye 64 and the original Perfect Dark made it. It has LOTS of customization, plenty of weapons, characters and stages, a map editor, and lots of single player challenges, as well as a campaign mode. |
|
| |
luke-ish Level 4 CPU
111
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:18 pm | |
| halo >>>>>>>>>>>> cod and shittlefield but halo isnt exactly the best either
if you want actual good fpses then look at say i dunno deus ex, half life, system shock two etc |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:10 pm | |
| |
|
| |
C_Mill24 Level 9 CPU
2072 C-Mill24
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:15 pm | |
| You allz stpid! Gldeneye iz bst gme. |
|
| |
madam im adam Level 5 CPU
472
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:29 pm | |
| wow casuals melee for life |
|
| |
luke-ish Level 4 CPU
111
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:20 pm | |
| - connor rents wrote:
- thief 2
^^^^^ GOTYAY |
|
| |
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:16 pm | |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkk-2RYQDLs
This right here sums up what is going on with CoD; it's stale and doesn't add much with each iteration |
|
| |
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:17 pm | |
| the poll shows that Halo is more popular with battlefield and CoD tied |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:06 am | |
| people take this shit way too seriously |
|
| |
Slissith
2277 ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:45 am | |
| - gonads wrote:
- people take this shit way too seriously
^^^^^ By the way, PS3 is the best console ever. |
|
| |
GAMEfreak329 Level 3 CPU
78
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:55 pm | |
| Slissith, make another thread for that, please don't start this debate |
|
| |
madam im adam Level 5 CPU
472
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:24 pm | |
| slissith can do whatever he wants
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:50 am | |
| the best console ever is obviously the commodore 64 |
|
| |
C_Mill24 Level 9 CPU
2072 C-Mill24
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:54 am | |
| No, it's definitely the Virtual Boy. |
|
| |
Ganonthegreat
5271 Ganonthegreat
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:57 am | |
| - C_Mill24 wrote:
- No, it's definitely the Virtual Boy.
Clearly you have never seen the awesome might that is the Leapster. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Call of Duty vs Halo vs Battlefield; the battle of the modern FPS genre | |
| |
|
| |
|