Poké Floats 2 Discussion BklTYr4

Project Crusade Community

HomePortalLatest imagesSearchRegisterLog in

Share
 

 Poké Floats 2 Discussion

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
SP



  3856
  cellularSP

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 7:39 am

I'm bored so I figured why not open a discussion to discuss the Pokémon floats that should appear in Poké Floats 2 (confirmed "sequel" stage to Poké Floats from Melee). I think that we shouldn't include any Pokémon that were in the 1st Poké Floats and no Pokémon that will be playable in Crusade. I also think that we should stay away from Legendaries (since there were no legendaries in the first Poké Floats) and that we should try to focus the floats on generations 3-5, with maybe some 1 and 2 thrown in.

Here are the Pokémon that will be playable in Crusade at some point/already are:

Squirtle
Ivysaur
Charizard
Pikachu
Pichu
Snivy
Dewott
Emboar
Lucario
Mewtwo
Jigglypuff
Zoroark
Meowth (DLC)
Deoxys (DLC)

If I'm forgetting any I apologize and you can mention those I missed.

Pokémon featured in the 1st Poké Floats:

Squirtle
Onix
Psyduck
Chikorita
Weezing
Slowpoke
Porygon
Wooper
Sudowoodo
Snorlax
Venusaur
Seel
Wobbuffet
Unown
Goldeen
Lickitung
Chansey
Geodude

Looking at this list, there were roughly 18 pokemon that appeared. I figure that we shouldn't go too far above this as too many Pokémon would be overkill in my opinion. I think a good capping point would be 25 Pokémon maximum. But once again, this is up for discussion.

I'm thinking that for right now we should just post what Pokémon we'd like to see and then move on from there somehow. inb4 everyone just posts their favorite Pokémon...


Last edited by StayPuft on Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 7:43 am

Just as a heads up, Meowth is also going to be DLC, and the other B/W Trainer Pokemon are Emboar and Dewott.
Back to top Go down
SP



  3856
  cellularSP

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 7:49 am

Mr. B. Psychic wrote:
Just as a heads up, Meowth is also going to be DLC, and the other B/W Trainer Pokemon are Emboar and Dewott.

I think it'd be better if it were Pignite and Samurott but WHATEVER
Back to top Go down
GigaPichu

GigaPichu

  3392

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 7:51 am

it's Dewott because Det wanted to play as Dewott
because Dewott is best form of Oshawott

also Emboar is best final form Fire Starter

(takes out flame shield)
Back to top Go down
SP



  3856
  cellularSP

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 7:53 am

GigaPichu wrote:
it's Dewott because Det wanted to play as Dewott
because Dewott is best form of Oshawott

also Emboar is best final form Fire Starter

(takes out flame shield)

/opinions
Back to top Go down
Dr.MarioX
Level 8 CPU
Dr.MarioX

  1703

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 8:15 am

So we're looking at what Pokemon could be platforms?

The Spriters Resource has this helpful little page here so I can look at all of the Pokemon. So these are Pokemon I support for Poke Floats 2:

Metapod
Vileplume
Diglett
Dunsparce
Mantine
Porygon 2
Pelipper
Shedinja
Camperupt
Wailord (should be the last Pokemon before it stars over because he's so big)
Metang or Metagross
Torterra
I don't particularly like a lot of the Gen V Pokemon, so I won't recommend any of them...
Back to top Go down
http://machriderz.deviantart.com/
Leo
Level 7 CPU
Leo

  Link
  1385

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 8:23 am

If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 8:43 am

URL wrote:
If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.
Back to top Go down
Smash King
Smash King
Smash King

  8744
  EJ88201

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 8:46 am

URL wrote:
If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.

This
Back to top Go down
Dejv
Level 3 CPU
Dejv

  75

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 10:14 am

To be honest, IMO, 1st, 2nd and 3rd one are the best generations, but If we need to have all generations in Pokefloats 2, then, I guess, it's ok.
Back to top Go down
Dr.MarioX
Level 8 CPU
Dr.MarioX

  1703

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 2:49 pm

URL wrote:
If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.

I don't see much logic in that. First of all, some Generations (namely IV and V) were not nearly as well received as Gen. I, II, or III. We should choose Pokemon who would be unique and fun to fight on. There's no reason to lock ourselves into five Pokemon from each generation. We should have Pokemon from each, but we should stick strictly to any numbers.

You've seen the character roster history - numbers don't work.
Back to top Go down
http://machriderz.deviantart.com/
Roy
Level 7 CPU
Roy

  1169
  RoyMaster4

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 3:49 pm

I enjoyed gen V more than III. Your opinion doesn't represent everyone. To be fair, all 5 should have the same number.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:04 pm

Dr.MarioX wrote:
URL wrote:
If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.

I don't see much logic in that. First of all, some Generations (namely IV and V) were not nearly as well received as Gen. I, II, or III. We should choose Pokemon who would be unique and fun to fight on. There's no reason to lock ourselves into five Pokemon from each generation. We should have Pokemon from each, but we should stick strictly to any numbers.

You've seen the character roster history - numbers don't work.
What you said made absolutely no sense~

Back to top Go down
Dr.MarioX
Level 8 CPU
Dr.MarioX

  1703

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:10 pm

My opinion may not matter, but I'm pretty sure the opinion of sites like this do.

If one Generation has one or two more Pokemon worthy and viable enough to be part of the stage than another Generation, then there's no reason to hold them back. It's wasted potential.
Back to top Go down
http://machriderz.deviantart.com/
Leo
Level 7 CPU
Leo

  Link
  1385

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:11 pm

Dr.MarioX wrote:
URL wrote:
If there's going to be 25 floats, we should have 5 pokemon from each generation, not unbalanced numbers.

I don't see much logic in that. First of all, some Generations (namely IV and V) were not nearly as well received as Gen. I, II, or III. We should choose Pokemon who would be unique and fun to fight on. There's no reason to lock ourselves into five Pokemon from each generation. We should have Pokemon from each, but we should stick strictly to any numbers.

You've seen the character roster history - numbers don't work.
There is logic on this, 5 floats for each generations is fair. DMX, in your opinion, only I, II and III deserve floats. This is wrong, Gen 4 and 5 were well recieved, here's some examples:
http://www.gamespot.com/pokemon-platinum-version/reviews/pokemon-platinum-review-6207856/
http://www.joystiq.com/2012/10/02/pokemon-black-and-white-2-review/
http://www.gamerankings.com/ds/960100-pokemon-soulsilver-version/index.html

Just because they didn't get perfect scores, it doesn't mean they should be completely ignored.
Also the differences between Ruby and White score is roughtly 0.5. I'm not trying to make a flamewar.


Last edited by URL on Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:21 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:19 pm

Dr.MarioX wrote:
My opinion may not matter, but I'm pretty sure the opinion of sites like this do.

If one Generation has one or two more Pokemon worthy and viable enough to be part of the stage than another Generation, then there's no reason to hold them back. It's wasted potential.
Omg who cares

It's gonna be a bunch of oversized Pokemon sprites on a sky backdrop you twat, stop stressing over it

Also you're going on and on about how reception matters and how some things are more worthy than others, yet you're citing IGN (one of the least credible and most widely hated gaming news sources on the planet)
Back to top Go down
Dr.MarioX
Level 8 CPU
Dr.MarioX

  1703

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:34 pm

I came here to suggest Pokemon, not to wipe up the tears of Zoroark and Lucario fan boys.

Now, let me SUGGEST these Pokemon again:
Metapod
Vileplume
Diglett
Dunsparce
Mantine
Porygon 2
Pelipper
Shedinja
Camperupt
Wailord (should be the last Pokemon before it stars over because he's so big)
Metang or Metagross
Torterra
I don't particularly like a lot of the Gen V Pokemon, so I won't recommend any of them...
Back to top Go down
http://machriderz.deviantart.com/
Guest
Guest



Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:39 pm

Dr.MarioX wrote:
I came here to suggest Pokemon, not to wipe up the tears of Zoroark and Lucario fan boys.
What are you even saying.
Back to top Go down
Leo
Level 7 CPU
Leo

  Link
  1385

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptySat Nov 24, 2012 4:41 pm

So you are suggesting 3 from I, 4 from II, 3 from III, 2 for IV and 0 from V.
Any way those are good suggestions I guess.
Also I don't like Zoroark.
Back to top Go down
JMan
Level 4 CPU
JMan

  Knuckles
  115

Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion EmptyFri Dec 14, 2012 5:28 pm

FK the other generations I say hoho
Back to top Go down
http://battlecrossfever.com
Sponsored content




Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty
PostSubject: Re: Poké Floats 2 Discussion   Poké Floats 2 Discussion Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Poké Floats 2 Discussion
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Project Crusade Community ::  :: Stage Discussion-
Jump to:  
Make a forum | ©phpBB | Free forum support | Report an abuse | Forumotion.com